REGULATORY UPDATE  /  MONTHLY

November 2026

DEVELOPMENTS
34
TOPICS
14
OPEN DEADLINES
4

Every LS Law Monthly Regulatory Update is researched, curated and written by our legal experts. Drawing on hands-on, in-house experience across the life sciences sector, they look beyond what has changed to consider what matters, why it matters and what it could mean in practice.

AUTHOR’S NOTE
Welcome to our November Regulatory Update providing you with the key legal and regulatory updates over the last month.
 
As usual lots of interesting snippets this month and we begin with the Government response to the National Commission's Recommendations on the Regulation of AI in healthcare. Whilst the Government confirmed it would accept all of the recommendations and the response commits to developing an agile approach to AI device regulation, supporting innovation whilst maintaining patient safety and public trust, we must wait a while for further detail.
 
The Government has agreed to publish draft guidance in December 2026 followed by an implementation roadmap setting out timelines and responsibilities across all 44 recommendations, which will be published in Spring 2027.
 
Another consultation outcome was also published this month on indefinite recognition of CE marked medical devices in Great Britain. Perhaps not surprisingly, the government has decided to proceed with legislative changes to indefinitely recognise CE marked medical devices certified under EUMDR and EU IVDR.
 
We have also seen Italy's Data Protection Authority, Garante, issue a hefty fine against IQVIA Italy for unlawful processing of patient health data. Garante found that the data was not anonymous, as claimed by IQVIA. In the context of recent focus on the area of anonymisation and pseudonymisation, it is perhaps not surprising we are seeing significant fines when controllers get this wrong.
 
Also, on the subject of data privacy, the Council of Europe agreed its negotiating mandate for the proposed Digital Omnibus regulation, which provoked a critical statement from the privacy organisation NOYB, specifically on the position taken in the mandate that ‘legitimate interests’ can serve as a valid legal basis for processing personal data in the context of developing and operating AI systems and models. It is going to be interesting to see how that one plays out.
 
Sanofi also avoided a fine for alleged anti-competitive disparagement of a competitor vaccine by offering commitments to the European Commission, which were accepted by the Commission as a satisfactory way of addressing their concerns.
This is an area of increased focus and the decision is well worth a read.
 
We hope you enjoy our November update.
Rebecca
11 November 2026

Advertising

2 ITEMS

Animal Testing

1 ITEM

Artificial Intelligence (AI)

6 ITEMS

Clinical Trials

3 ITEMS

Competition Law

1 ITEM

Data Protection

5 ITEMS

Enforcement

1 ITEM

Medical Devices

5 ITEMS

Pharmacovigilance

1 ITEM

Real World Data and Evidence

1 ITEM

Regulatory

2 ITEMS

Safety

2 ITEMS

Strategy, Policy, Investment and Trade

3 ITEMS

Urban Wastewater Treatment Directive

1 ITEM

Want to know how this applies to your organisation?

Contact one of our life science legal experts to discuss your requirements.

Get in touch